Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply. To register, click here. Registration is FREE!
T O P I C R E V I E W
vicki-a
Posted - 08 July 2008 : 16:43:22 Hi there, My partupt in went bankrupt in 2006 he had 2 AEO's the recivers said this would go with it but 2 months later we were told they didnt, a few months ago the reciver told us they had made a misstake and they where ment to go we r in contact with local CAB who r helping but now im stuck because i have found out the reciver have been taking one of the AEO's are they allowed to do this without telling us? i would be greatful for your view on this matter thanks vicki
1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First)
melanie_giles
Posted - 09 July 2008 : 00:32:45 Hi there and welcome to the forum
A bankruptcy order takes priority over AEOs which should have been cancelled with effect from the date of the bankruptcy order. If these payments are still being deducted from salary, then the OR should be sorting this out with the creditors concerned.
If the AEOs are for an IPA or IPO, this is a separate issue, and you will need to take this up with the OR directly - and either way these can only last for a maximum of three years.
For an informal chat about any financial difficulties, or advice as to the options available, I can be contacted via my website - www.melaniegiles.com
