HOME  FORUM  MEDIA  EVENTS  ARTICLES  TV  BLOGS
•Home
Bankruptcy:
•Bankruptcy Information Center
•What is Bankruptcy?
•Is Bankruptcy right for me?

•How to declare Bankruptcy?
•What happens to my assets?
•Bankruptcy and credit rating

Forum:
•forum
•register
•search
•faq
•experts

Blogs:
•Bankruptcy News
•More...

Media Room:
•Press releases
•Media Coverage

Other:
•About BankruptcyHelp
•Links
•Contact us
•Debt Glossary
•Insolvency jobs


FORUM
  > Browse and post on our forum
Home   |   Profile   |   Register   |   Active Topics   |   Members   |   Search   |   FAQ

Welcome to our Forum, please register if you want to post
Ask a debt question
See the last 250 posts
Watch video on how to use forum
Username:
Password:

Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Bankruptcy News
 bankruptcy news
 Monthly bank charges not wanted
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

BankruptcyNews
Junior Member

358 Posts

Posted - 09 August 2007 :  12:54:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'


Bank customers do not want monthly account fees even if it spells the end of penalty charges, a survey suggests.

The High Court is due to decide in a test case whether the level of penalty charges made by banks is lawful.

If the banks lose, some fear they may try to recoup money with monthly fees or by charging for each transaction.

A YouGov survey of 2,116 people for website Moneysupermarket.com suggested just 8% wanted a regular fee with 1% wanting a charge for each transaction.

At the moment, people can be charged as much as £35 for going overdrawn without authorisation or for having a direct debit refused.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is investigating the current penalty charges system.

Pay-per-transaction

Some experts suggest that the money from these charges essentially subsidises the accounts of people who did not incur them.


Kevin Mountford, head of current accounts at moneysupermarket.com, said free banking was possible "largely because of the number of people who are hit with fees and charges".

If this was outlawed, a pay-per-transaction system - as used in many other countries - could be introduced in the UK.

"We could well see the system prevalent in Western Europe, North America and Australia, where there are a certain number of free transactions and then you pay for any additional ones," Mr Mountford said.

"We have already seen some providers abandon the concept of free banking by steadily introducing a bevy of charges on their less profitable customers."

The introduction of such transaction charges could lead to a change in the spending habits of people used to making cash withdrawals or multiple card transactions, he added.

Court action

There has been a growing consumer campaign against bank charges.

Tens of thousands of bank customers have threatened to take their current account provider to court for the return of bank charges.

They have argued that the charges are excessive and breach consumer law.

To date the banks have avoided taking on consumers head-on in court.

Instead, banks have preferred to pay-up or have simply not turned-up to court hearings.

Therefore, the OFT, with the agreement of the banks, has decided to take a test case over the scale and legality of their charges to court.

If the OFT wins it could lead to hundreds of millions of pounds in bank charges being returned to customers.

However, if the banks win it will effectively bring the issue to a close and enshrine their right to levy charges on people who go into unauthorised overdraft.

Source: bbc.co.uk

See my Blogs:
http://bankruptcynews.blogs.bankruptcyhelp.org.uk
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
bankruptcyhelp.org.uk Forum © bankruptcyhelp Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06