HOME  FORUM  MEDIA  EVENTS  ARTICLES  TV  BLOGS
•Home
Bankruptcy:
•Bankruptcy Information Center
•What is Bankruptcy?
•Is Bankruptcy right for me?

•How to declare Bankruptcy?
•What happens to my assets?
•Bankruptcy and credit rating

Forum:
•forum
•register
•search
•faq
•experts

Blogs:
•Bankruptcy News
•More...

Media Room:
•Press releases
•Media Coverage

Other:
•About BankruptcyHelp
•Links
•Contact us
•Debt Glossary
•Insolvency jobs


FORUM
  > Browse and post on our forum
Home   |   Profile   |   Register   |   Active Topics   |   Members   |   Search   |   FAQ

Welcome to our Forum, please register if you want to post

 All Forums
 New Questions
 Forum Questions
 Statutory demand incorrectly served

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
trainee solicitor Posted - 31 January 2009 : 20:59:03
I am a trainee solicitor and have served a statutory demand on an individual. However, instead of personal service it was just sent through the post and then after 21 days a Bankruptcy Petition was served. At the court hearing the judge said that the statutory demand had not been served correctly but agreed to postpone the bankruptcy hearing until Feb. He said that if the Statutory demand is not served correctly then he can strike the bankruptcy petition out. Therefore do i just serve the same statutory demand by personal service? or do I have to start the whole process again? Do they need 21days again?
3   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
go_4_broke Posted - 31 January 2009 : 22:57:37
I think if there is any risk of confusion you need to start again and follow the whole procedure through to the letter.

A Stat. Demand not served is technically invalid.

You could just reserve it as John suggests but if there is any doubt that due process has not been properly followed a good defence could get the case thrown out again.

Best Regards
John Posted - 31 January 2009 : 21:18:52
Hi

looking at your post again I think that as the judge must be sure that the defendant has had 21 days to respond to the demand prior to the hearing, and as you used the postal sytem therefore he cannot be sure when it arrived, that the postponement of the hearing is for him to know in his own mind that the defendant has had the requisit length of time during which to settle the debt.

I do not therefore think that you have to do anymore except turn up to the resceduled hearing pursuing your original claim.

After all it was merely a postponement.
If it was thrown out altogether then he would not have rescheduled and you would have to start again.
John Posted - 31 January 2009 : 21:08:42
Hi

did the judge not explain in what way he deemed that the stat demand had been served incorrectly?

bankruptcyhelp.org.uk Forum © bankruptcyhelp Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06